None of the 15 tested large model products disclosed the source of training data; based on technical limitations, each company claimed that it could not fully guarantee the authenticity and accuracy of AI-generated content; the vast majority of large model products stated that the information content and prompts entered by users would be used for model training, and only 4 allowed users to revoke authorization of voice data.
…. The three AI products with the highest transparency scores are: Tencent Yuanbao (72 points), iFlytek’s SparkDesk (69 points), and Zhipu’s Qingyan (67 points); the three that rank the lowest are: Baichuan’s Baixiaoying (54), ModelBest’s Luca (51 points), and Metaso [秘塔] (43 points).
The “Report” calls for enhancing the transparency of large model services, which is directly linked to whether the model is trustworthy, and also related to users’ evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content, and better identification of potential AI risks. — Read More
Daily Archives: December 23, 2024
Is OpenAI o3 Really AGI?
The world may have changed, and we might not have realized it yet.
Yesterday, OpenAI shocked (and this is not hyperbole) everyone with the announcement of OpenAI o3 and o3-mini, the brand new models of the ‘o’ family (they skipped ‘o2’ due to trademark reasons).
o3 results are so astonishing that some people are actually convinced that it is AGI, as it destroys some of the so-called ‘impossible’ benchmarks for current models. — Read More