AI is eating the Internet

“You see? Another ad. We were just talking about this yesterday! How can you be so sure they’re not listening to us?” – My wife, at least once a week.

Internet advertising has gotten so good, it’s spooky. We worry about how much “they” know about us, but in exchange, we got something future generations may not: free content and services, and a mostly open Internet. It is unprecedented Faustian bargain, one that is now collapsing.

At the epicenter of the modern Internet sits Google. Forget the East India Company, Google, with an absurd +$100B in net income, is arguably the most successful business in history. By commanding nearly 70% of the global browser market and 89% of the search engine market, they dominated Internet through sheer reach. How did this happen? A delicate balance of incentives where every player on the Internet got exactly what they wanted. — Read More

#big7

AI and Secure Code Generation

At the end of 2024, 25 percent of new code at Google was being written not by humans, but by generative large language models (LLMs)—a practice known as “vibe coding.” While the name may sound silly, vibe coding is a tectonic shift in the way software is built. Indeed, the quality of LLMs themselves is improving at a rapid pace in every dimension we can measure—and many we can’t. This rapid automation is transforming software engineering on two fronts simultaneously: Artificial intelligence (AI) is not only writing new code; it is also beginning to analyze, debug, and reason about existing human-written code.

As a result, traditional ways of evaluating security—counting bugs, reviewing code, and tracing human intent—are becoming obsolete. AI experts no longer know if AI-generated code is safer, riskier, or simply vulnerable in different ways than human-written code. We must ask: Do AIs write code with more bugs, fewer bugs, or entirely new categories of bugs? And can AIs reliably discover vulnerabilities in legacy code that human reviewers miss—or overlook flaws humans find obvious? Whatever the answer, AI will never again be as inexperienced at code security analysis as it is today. And as is typical with information security, we are leaping into the future without useful metrics to measure position or velocity. — Read More

#devops

Why China isn’t about to leap ahead of the West on compute

We keep hearing that China is catching up with the West in AI compute. A great example of this comes from NVIDIA’s CEO Jensen Huang, who recently claimed that China has made “enormous progress” in the last few years, and that “China is right behind us. We’re very, very close.”

And China has indeed been making a ton of progress. As we’ll see, Chinese hardware has been closing the gap across a range of metrics relating to computational power and data transfer, both of which are crucial aspects of AI workloads.

But despite progress on these metrics, we don’t think China is about to leap ahead of the West on AI compute. China’s top developers—including Alibaba, ByteDance, Baidu, and DeepSeek—still rely primarily on NVIDIA chips. And major bottlenecks still remain before China can leap ahead. — Read More

#china-vs-us